Apply for Settled Status under the EUSS Based on Historic Residence
Table of Contents
The EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) was introduced to protect the residence rights of EU citizens and their family members who were living in the UK before the end of the Brexit transition period at 11pm on 31 December 2020. While public attention focused on those living in the UK at that time, EU law and the Withdrawal Agreement also protect certain individuals whose qualifying residence occurred years earlier.
This article explains when historic residence can still lead to Settled Status, how the Home Office assesses such applications, and how EU law principles continue to underpin successful outcomes.
Can Historic Residence still lead to Settled Status under the EU Settlement Scheme?
EU citizens and their qualifying family members may still be eligible for Settled Status where they completed a continuous qualifying period of five years’ lawful residence in the UK at any point before 31 December 2020.
Crucially, the five-year qualifying period can be a historic period of residence. What matters is that the residence was in accordance with EU free movement law and that the right of permanent residence, once acquired, was not subsequently lost.
This is particularly relevant for individuals who lived in the UK for extended periods as children of EU workers, for those who, as students, left the UK for further education, or for workers who took up employment abroad and returned to the UK after Brexit. In many cases, those individuals had already acquired permanent residence under EU law long before they realised it.
What Counts as Lawful Residence under EU law?
Lawful residence can be established in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2004/38/EC. This includes residence as a worker, a student, a self-employed person or a self-sufficient person, as well as residence as a qualifying family member.
For historic residence established in accordance with Article 7(1)(b) and (c), where the individual was a self-sufficient person or a student, they must have had comprehensive sickness insurance cover. EU case law, VI v HMRC (C-247/20), has confirmed that, as a matter of EU law, once a Union citizen is affiliated to a public sickness insurance system in the host state, such as the NHS in the UK, they are to be regarded as holding comprehensive sickness insurance for the purposes of Directive 2004/38/EC.
How does the Withdrawal Agreement protect Historic Permanent Residence?
Article 15 of the Withdrawal Agreement preserves the right of permanent residence for EU citizens and their family members who completed five years’ lawful residence in accordance with EU law.
“Periods of legal residence or work in accordance with Union law before and after the end of the transition period shall be included in the calculation of the qualifying period necessary for acquisition of the right of permanent residence. “
Article 15(3) provides that, once acquired, the right of permanent residence is lost through absence from the host state for a period exceeding five consecutive years.
The effect of these provisions is that an applicant may rely on any historic five-year period of lawful residence, even if it ended many years before Brexit, provided that no supervening event occurred to extinguish the right.
What is a Supervening Event and Why is it Decisive?
For most historic residence cases, the relevant supervening event is prolonged absence from the UK. Permanent residence is lost where the individual has been absent from the UK for more than five consecutive years after completing their qualifying period.
A short trip to the UK is sufficient to prevent the loss of permanent residence. As a result, individuals who left the UK but returned occasionally for flight transit, tourism, job interviews, short courses or other commitments may have preserved their permanent residence.
Other supervening events, for the purposes of Appendix EU, include exclusion, removal or deportation decisions. These do not alter Article 15(3) itself, but they operate as separate grounds on which an application under the EU Settlement Scheme must, or may, be refused. They are far less common in historic residence cases.
What if Someone Returned to the UK after Brexit on a Student or Skilled Worker visa?
This is where many applicants become confused. Returning to the UK on a Student visa or Skilled Worker visa does not, in itself, prevent an application under the EU Settlement Scheme based on historic residence.
Where an individual had already acquired permanent residence under EU law before leaving the UK, later residence under domestic immigration routes does not negate that historic right. The individual is not seeking to rely on their Student or Skilled Worker residence to qualify for Settled Status. Instead, they are relying on rights that were acquired earlier and were preserved by the Withdrawal Agreement.
Why are Late Applications in these cases still viable?
Although the deadline to apply under the EU Settlement Scheme was 30 June 2021, the Home Office still accepts late applications where there are reasonable grounds for the delay.
Individuals who had left the UK years earlier often did not know that they were eligible, or even required, to apply under the EU Settlement Scheme. Many reasonably believed that Brexit was only relevant to those living in the UK at the time. Others returned to the UK under Student or Skilled Worker visas, assuming that those routes were the only available options.
Where an applicant relies on historic permanent residence, and does not have Pre-Settled Status under the EUSS, reasonable grounds must be explained for a late application. For example, the Home Office deems it to be a reasonable ground for a late application if an EEA citizen or their family member resident in the UK by the end of the transition period has limited leave to enter or remain granted under another part of the Immigration Rules, which does not expire until after the 30 June 2021 deadline.
What is the Outcome of an Application based on Historic Residence?
A successful application will result in the grant of Settled Status, conferring indefinite leave to remain in the UK. The individual will live and work in the UK without restriction and may sponsor eligible family members under the EU Settlement Scheme rather than under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules.
If the individual does not wish to return to the UK immediately, Settled Status can be preserved provided they return to the UK at least once every five years.
Why do Historic Residence Cases require Legal Assessment?
Historic residence applications sit at the intersection of EU free movement law, the Withdrawal Agreement, and domestic immigration policy. Many eligible individuals assume they are excluded because they left the UK years ago or because they had a long absence from the UK after they were granted Pre-Settled Status.
Where a historic qualifying period exists and no supervening event has occurred, EU law continues to protect those rights. Proper identification of the legal basis of residence and careful presentation of evidence are often decisive in securing a successful outcome.
Our Successful Cases
R studied and worked in the UK for a continuous period of five years before leaving the UK to pursue further studies overseas. She later returned to the UK in 2023 under another immigration route, having previously been advised that she was not eligible to apply under the EU Settlement Scheme.
We provided evidence of R’s historic lawful residence in the UK in accordance with EU law, demonstrating that she had completed a qualifying five-year period prior to the end of the transition period and had not been absent from the UK for more than five consecutive years since. We also submitted evidence of the incorrect advice she had previously received regarding her eligibility under the EUSS, together with a comprehensive letter of representations addressing the reasonable grounds and the Appendix EU requirements.
R was granted Settled Status on the basis of her historic residence and preserved right of permanent residence under the Withdrawal Agreement.
C, an EU national, lived in the UK for five years as a child with C's parents, who were also EU nationals exercising Treaty rights through employment in the UK. C later returned to the UK and applied for Pre-Settled Status under the EU Settlement Scheme. C then left the UK to study abroad. Under the new 30/60 rules, C would not ordinarily qualify for Settled Status unless C returns to the UK and lives in the UK for a further 2.5 years.
We submitted evidence of C’s parents’ historic residence and employment in the UK, C’s medical and educational records, and travel evidence confirming that C had not been absent from the UK for more than five consecutive years since completing the qualifying period. C was granted Settled Status on the basis that C had acquired permanent residence under EU law during childhood, which had been preserved under Article 15 of the Withdrawal Agreement.